If you ask nearly all the world's climate scientists9 Sectret Pesonal Study (Rated 19 Secret Lesson) there's simply no debate: The planet is warming as amounts of greenhouse gases rise in the air -- and human activity is primarily to blame.
But Scott Pruitt, head of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, insists on debating climate change. And that debate, apparently, might be televised, Reuters reported on Tuesday.
SEE ALSO: Antarctic ice shelf crack is moving at record speeds, poised to cleave off massive iceberg any minuteDoubters of mainstream climate science, including Pruitt, argue that dissenting views haven't been heard by the scientific community. They falsely claim that plenty of questions still remain about the scientific evidence for human-caused global warming.
In reality, however, while there is uncertainty about how quickly and severely rising temperatures will affect the planet, there's virtually no doubt among climate scientists that climate change is happening -- and that it's happening because of us.
By calling for a debate, Pruitt creates a false narrative that casts his critics as stubborn, inflexible bullies who are hell-bent on destroying the fossil fuel industry. In this scenario, climate scientists and their allies are jealously guarding the climate discussion. Why don't other folks, like coal company executives, get to have a say?
Rather than inform the public, all this does is cast clouds of distrust and disbelief over the scientific community. That's why climate scientists say calls for such debates are disconcerting: According to the Trump administration, satellite observations, ground measurements, field research, and deeply scrutinized results -- gathered over decades and from across the globe -- simply aren't sufficiently convincing.
In the interview with Reuters, Pruitt called for a "robust discussion" about climate change, though he didn't explain how the scientists participating in that discussion would be chosen.
Asked if the debate should be televised, Pruitt told Reuters: "I think so. I think so. I mean, I don’t know yet, but you want this to be open to the world. You want this to be on full display. I think the American people would be very interested in consuming that. I think they deserve it."
The TV debate would likely build on or coincide with the Trump administration's plans to host so-called "red team, blue team" debates on climate science.
Pruitt, who denies that carbon dioxide is the main cause of global warming (it is), would reportedly help pick the experts. He's floated the idea in recent weeks, saying such discussions would be modeled on processes used for evaluating military battle plans and ways that spacecraft engineers test critical systems or investigate accidents.
Many climate scientists said they see this plan as a direct assault on the scientific process. Looping in non-experts to debate climate science would be like asking a person who likes looking at the stars to go head-to-head with actual astronomers and physicists.
"It's one thing to respond to legitimate scientific criticism, quite another to refute unconstrained nonsense," Kate Marvel, a scientist at NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York, previously told Mashable.
Redux: Another Drink by The Paris ReviewStealing It Back: A Conversation with Frida Orupabo by Maya BinyamDo Not Et Cetera by The Paris ReviewWhat Our Spring Issue Writers Are Looking At by The Paris ReviewOn Thomas Bernhard and Girls Online by The Paris ReviewHow to Choose Your Perfume: A Conversation with Sianne Ngai and Anna Kornbluh by Jude StewartTwo in the Afternoon by Mieko KawakamiPhotographic Neuroses: Alec Soth's A Pound of Pictures by Gideon JacobsRemembrance Day by Spencer MathesonIn Odesa: Recommended Reading by Ilya KaminskyFlight Paths by Omar El AkkadThe Dress by Cynthia ZarinWe Need the Eggs: On Annie Hall, Love, and Delusion by Sheila HetiAnnouncing Our Spring Issue by Emily StokesDavid Wojnarowicz’s Home in the City by Hannah GoldAgainst Any Intrusion: Writing to Gwen John by Celia PaulRedux: Conceptual Baggage by The Paris ReviewTricks, Tension, Surface, Suspense by Andrew Norman WilsonClaire Boyles, Fiction by Claire BoylesIntroducing the Winners of the 2022 Whiting Awards by The Paris Review Watch out Kylie Jenner, North West is coming for your makeup throne No, Steve Bannon did not align himself with Darth Vader Snapchat now lets you add Bitmoji to on Watching Hillary Clinton lose made women feel worse about their own careers Klay Thompson casually swigs a beer during post I spent my morning at New York's new Taylor Swift Experience LeBron James gives Smithsonian $2.5 million to honor Muhammad Ali 4 incredibly backward, WTF quotes from Trump's attorney general nominee What do your cereal and Monsanto herbicide have in common? This chemical. Trump supporters are demanding Starbucks employees write 'Trump' on their cups Dying teen's heartbreaking letter helps win battle to have body cryogenically frozen Look how huge the new 15 Video shows the harrowing reality of job interviews when you're autistic Muslim man verbally harassed in Starbucks shares harrowing experience online Warner Bros. buys Machinima, a digital studio focused on gamer culture This humanitarian tells us how to stay real when you're Instagram famous Fake news has gotten so bad Obama had to weigh in We need to talk about Cam Newton's fox tail cleats Twitter has spoken and it gives 'The Grand Tour' a glowing review Ballet dancers make Mexico City their stage in stunning photo series
1.7039s , 10137.0390625 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【19 Sectret Pesonal Study (Rated 19 Secret Lesson)】,Unobstructed Information Network