【male eroticism】

Have 99 cents you're looking to throw into the figurative garbage?male eroticism Well then, have I got a website for you!

SEE ALSO: We finally know how Jeff Bezos will spend his billions

On WhoPaid99Cents.com you can pay 99 cents to see who else has paid 99 cents. That's it. That's literally the point of the site. If you're confused, consider yourself in good company, for I too am very confused by this website's existence.

But, in the name of good, sound, investigative journalism, we paid the 99 cents to see what would happen, and as promised we were shown who also paid 99 cents: 19 people at the time of writing.

Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

Most of the names included in the website's tally of people who have paid 99 cents—which will be shown to you once you pay your 99 cent fee—are probably (definitely) fake, unless "Simba The Lion" and "Bung o" are far more common names than I realized.

People also shared links to their blogs and SoundCloud accounts—though, upon a quick search the user was revealed to not exist—in lieu of a name. Gotta respect the hustle, I guess?

After you've paid your 99 cents you're also given the option to "do it again," meaning you can pay 99 cents again to see who else has paid 99 cents again. I highly recommend you not do this because it is a gross misuse of your capital.

Mashable Trend Report Decode what’s viral, what’s next, and what it all means. Sign up for Mashable’s weekly Trend Report newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

So, what's the draw of paying 99 cents? Curiosity? Boredom? An attempt at self promotion? I can't definitively tell you, but I can see the appeal of creating such a website.

Should this website ever go viral, it could prove to be quite profitable for its creator. If 100 people pay 99 cents, that's $99, if 1,000 people pay 99 cents that's $999. Seems like a worthwhile enough money-making venture to me. If people are willing to spend money on literally nothing, why not reap the rewards?

The website, while an amusing gag, also feels like a symptom of a late capitalist society gone awry and a critique of America's excess. We're literally spending money just for the sake of spending money now. Did Thinko, LLC, the computer entertainment company that created the website take this into consideration when creating WhoPaid99Cents.com? Or, was it just a goof?

According to Thinko, it was very much just a goof. A project born out of a love for "dumb slices of internet."

"We've built a buncha (sic) serious products with heavy duty tech in the past, but the thing that tickles us most is using computers to do funny things," Pasquale D'Silva, a Thinko employee wrote via email."I think a lot of people would agree that most of the internet sucks right now… or it's too serious. We're firm believers that the antidote is making better, funny internet. We pretty much build anything that makes us laugh."

D'Silva also said that Thinko has plans to "build more" silly bits of internet.

Regardless, please don't throw your money away on this site. If you've got some extra cash handy why not give it to charities that could really benefit from it? Like, RAICES, All Hands and Hearts, Charity:Water, or the Southern Environmental Law Center, just to name a few.

[h/t: Taylor Lorenz]

---

Featured Video For You

---

To protect your loose change from sneaky thieves, use this maze puzzle box

---

• Shopping
• Games
• Science
• Deals
• Digital Culture
• Social Good
• Tech
• Life

• Best robot vacuum deal: Save $400 on the roborock Q5 Pro+
• India threatens to expel Amazon employees for selling Indian flag doormats
• Miami Heat invest in rising esports team
• 'This Is Us' Spoilers: Is Toby Dead or Alive?
• Best robot vacuum deal: Get the Shark Matrix Plus 2
• Donald Trump addressed alleged lurid sexual acts by saying he's a 'germaphobe'
• Join us for a chat with Woody Harrelson about his live film 'Lost in London'
• Apple once envisioned the iPhone with an iPod click wheel and it was horrible
• LA Galaxy vs. Tigres 2025 livestream: Watch Concacaf Champions Cup for free
• Judge dismisses libel suit against Trump because his tweets are 'hyperbolic'

• Sadie Stein on Missed Connections
• The Last Call Killer: Everything you need to know
• Start 2014 with a Dual Subscription to McSweeney’s and The Paris Review
• Lysley Tenorio’s Window on the World
• Ice—It’s More Than Just Frozen Water! by Dan Piepenbring
• Anthony Cudahy
• Book News for January 13, 2014
• Franzen on Kraus: Footnote 3 by Jonathan Franzen
• Franzen on Kraus: Footnote 48 by Jonathan Franzen
• What We’re Loving: Mouly, Minneapolis, Marié by The Paris Review

• NYT Connections hints and answers for May 10: Tips to solve 'Connections' #699.
• These pins support human rights just in time for the Women's March
• Airlines can now stop warning passengers about Samsung Galaxy Note7 before flights
• Taco Bell's newest creation may be the grossest fast food invention yet
• Best Apple deal: Save $19 on AirTag 4
• Star Wars museum finally picks official home
• Uber adds calendar shortcuts to set destinations faster
• Facebook just fixed a major battery
• Best smartwatch deal: Save $40 on the Fitbit Versa 4
• Windows privacy control is about to get much better

• Best speaker deal: Save $30 on the JBL Clip 5
• Apple once envisioned the iPhone with an iPod click wheel and it was horrible
• Facebook just fixed a major battery
• Report alleges Russia tried to use an American tech entrepreneur to hack targets
• How to Settle Down with Dystopia
• Japanese report says peace signs make fingerprint data vulnerable
• Bumble's new video option will make dating even harder
• Professor unwittingly buys back the same exact book she lost 5 years ago
• Bomb Envy
• Kind mailman builds ramp for neighborhood senior dog